Joe Zabel’s doin’ some big thinking over Examiner way, and I’ve come away more confused by the question than anything; not about the answer, but why the question is being asked, since it seems self-evident. Short form, he’s wondering if the “webcomics community” is shrinking even while “webcomics” are expanding. Slightly longer version, from the introductory paragraphs:
Recently a friend of mine made an observation that got me to wondering. “The webcomics medium is burgeoning,�? he said, “but the webcomics community is this tight little group of old-timers who always show up with the same opinions and the same agenda. And while the number of webcomic creators is growing by leaps and bounds, the ‘webcomics community’ is drastically shrinking.�?
I was so captivated by this notion of a paradoxical shrinkage at the center of a flourishing artistic movement that I decided to poll a number of colleagues about it and do some further research and brainstorming to hypothesize what’s really going on.
Zabel wisely starts with a definition of his terms:
But by “webcomics community,�? understand that I’m not referring to the entire body of people who participate in webcomics as readers or artists; this aggregate group is certainly on the rise. By “webcomics community�? I mean the community at the center of all this activity, the people who are interested in webcomics in general– in webcomics as a medium, as a distribution method, as an artform, as a pursuit. I’m thinking of the community of artists who create webcomics, along with avid fans of the medium, and (dare I say it) the critics and journalists who focus on the medium.
By those criteria, it’s fair to say that Zabel would place himself in the “webcomics community”; whether or not he’s correct to place this group “at the center of all this activity” is a matter of personal opinion. But here’s where things get a bit … ironic. Zabel starts soliciting opinions on the direction of this center, talking with Shaenon Garrity, T Campbell, Joey Manley, Mike Meginnis, David Hellman, Tym Godek, and Eric Burns. With the possible exception of (curiously enough) Manley, everybody Zabel spoke to is arguably a part of the center as he defines it. This sort of reduces the question to, “Does a self-identified group in a larger culture become less important as the culture becomes still larger and more diverse?”
All together now: yes. There’s plenty of people creating and reading webcomics that never heard of Big Panda, and have read the work of first-generation creators. New webcomics crop up all the time; it’s true that without the first generation, they wouldn’t have the same environment to grow in, but does that mean that they owe alliegance to this center?
The task facing those of us who love webcomics is not to form a Webcomics Academy, it’s to make sure that every offering in this marketplace of amusements gets a chance to find an audience. Creators and projects will come and go, they’ll shift tone and audience, and local concentrations of interest will form and disperse, regardless of what definition of Webcomics (capitalized, proper noun) you follow. It’s not a case of whether or not the center will hold.
It’s whether or not the center ever truly exsited. As Zabel’s describing it, I don’t think so.