Gotcher Clever Title Here, Bunky
Million things to do before I get on a plane tomorrow; next week’s updates at odd times due to time zone shifts.
- So, pointing out the flaws in a system by exploiting them is “deeply immoral”, and “shameful and disappointing.” Good to have that cleared up, Jimbo. Edit: But identity fraud? That’s cool.
- Lunchbox Funnies create-o-tron Ryan Sias has unveiled the very first t-shrit in webcomics history.
- R Stevens is asking an intriguing question, but I don’t have good data to answer it. Anybody got some good numbers we can play with?
- I feel no shame about hating Rachael Ray, scourge of all that’s good and tasty, and I’d so watch this show starring Anthony Bourdain.
Heh, “T-shrit”.
Oh Ryan, how we love him, but he must be the worst sprellr ever. Sometimes after deciphering an e-mail from him, I wonder if English isn’t his first language.
Now go get some cute-astic Tenderness shirts! Or a TendNerness one. =D
By Tyler Martin on 03.02.07 2:36 pm
Tsk Tsk… shameful! And disappointing!
Not the t-shirt, Ryan. I was, of course, referring to myself.
By Paul Southworth on 03.02.07 2:45 pm
Plane trip? Did you score tickets to the Anna Nicole funeral?
SWEEEEEET, Gary.
As always, you are the awesome.
By Bg Porter on 03.02.07 3:19 pm
“So, pointing out the flaws in a system by exploiting them is “deeply immoralâ€?, and “shameful and disappointing.â€? Good to have that cleared up, Jimbo.”
Speaking as a neophyte webcomicker and someone with no connection Wikipedia at all… I think Wales is unequivocably in the right. Listing webcomics is not a part of Wikipedia’s ‘thing’.
Throwing a shit-fit over that is stupid. Deliberately breaking one of Wikipedia’s fundamental rules (that’s the ‘immoral and shameful’ bit) over it is stupid. Please, please stop fanning this ‘controversy’. Please stop embarrassing webcomis in the eyes of absolutely everyone else.
By ninjacrat on 03.03.07 12:30 am
From Part 2:
“Wikipedia can rightly delete a poorly sourced article on a blog with 2.4 million monthly readers that has The Washington Post as a source, yet somehow non-webcomics bloggers seem to be able to avoid being overly dramatic about it.”
By L on 03.03.07 2:31 am
Ninjacrat, you’re correct.
But because of the geek group think has reared it’s ugly head again, your criticisms of Straub’s attention-seaking wiki-trolling will fall upon deaf ears. Don’t waste your time.
By The William G on 03.03.07 6:33 am
You’re wrong WILLIAM. This wikipedia people are more evil than Osama bin Hitler.
An encyclopedia that doesn’t have a detailed entry on Kit ‘n Kay Boodle is NO ENCYCLOPEDIA OF MINE!
By Zach on 03.03.07 3:22 pm
The above comments are owned by whoever posted them. The staff of Fleen are not responsible for them in any way.