This Is Dumb
It’s nice when Ryan North does my work for me. I can sip my morning coffee, squint through my hangover and have a steaming goblet of web comics news sitting right there in my inbox waiting for me. Thanks Ryan.
So anyway, the good Mr North was point us bitter, haggard wordbeasts in the direction of For Better or For Worse – where Lynn has started to “animate” the comics. I’m all for that sort of thing. I’m a big Homestar Runner fan. I loved the Dilbert cartoon. I like most things animated/internet/comic related, but a character blinking in a panel or two is not an animated comic.
Maybe I’m being a little harsh, but when you read a piece of sequential art you have to read it in order to experience it fully. This is quite difficult to do when your eye is constantly being drawn to some sort of movement in the upcoming panels. Maybe it wouldn’t be so bad if the movement was something exciting, but it isn’t. It’s blinking.
It’s probably one of the stupidest ideas ever.
The blinking actually reminds you how *static* the rest of the panel is. It does nothing to preserve the suspension of disbelief. It’s distracting. It’s pointless.
It’s SO stupid.
By Maritza on 08.02.06 6:45 pm
How Stupid Is It?
By Jeff Lowrey on 08.02.06 7:23 pm
Pretty damn stupid!
By Paul Southworth on 08.02.06 7:25 pm
Approximately three units of stupidity.
By Matt Buchwald on 08.02.06 7:42 pm
Today wasn’t blinking! So HA!
Today was, um…making the “bad word” symbols blink.
By bup on 08.02.06 8:29 pm
Orneryboy had some recent animated comics that were enjoyable, made a nice climax to the current storyline. But they were full panels, and were in comics with very little text (except for the last one).
By Anthony on 08.02.06 9:17 pm
You can always hit the little stop buttons to stop them from blinking, I suppose. But I completely agree. The first time I saw them blinking a few weeks ago, I just rolled my eyes.
Lynn Johnston entered the “modern age” in the worst way possible.
The best way possible? Garfield. He has a FULL archive all the way back to the first comics Davis ever drew in the 80s. Now THAT is cool. Too bad I don’t care to read any of them.
By lucas on 08.02.06 9:44 pm
correction… the 70s. Garfield started in the 70s. Like most terrible things.
By lucas on 08.02.06 9:45 pm
permit me one more: Orneryboy animations were on another level. That comic has so much movement in the feeling of the comic already that the animation WORKED on those strips.
For Better, on the other hand, has more of a feel like “moments” in time… paintings almost. The feeling is beautiful, subtle. Like the artwork. Why the animations, which are really cheesy, need to be there to spoil that effect of timelessness is beyond me.
By Lucas TdS on 08.02.06 9:47 pm
NOW, if they can only get some of those comics to just completely BLINK off of the goddamn comics page, we’d be onto something.
By Yirmumah on 08.02.06 10:58 pm
I’m surprised she hasn’t started making them flash like those annoying advertisements you see everywhere.
BLINK BLINK BLINK BLINK
By Lucas TdS on 08.03.06 12:20 am
You’re missing the point. The reason that this is news is that it confirms that FBORFW is now a webcomic which happens to run in newspapers, rather than the other way around.
yrs–
–Ben
By Ben Lehman on 08.03.06 1:24 am
My wife is a big fan of FBofW, and even she thinks that the animations are king dumb.
By Matt Buchwald on 08.03.06 7:18 am
You underestimate Lynn Johnston – the goal of the blinking eyes is merely to send the readers spirally down into the inky black maw of madness.
I can’t really hate it, persay – its like a kid discovered a nifty new toy, and simply has to play with it, even when doing so is entirely inappropriate.
But man does it look dumb.
By Mr. Myth on 08.03.06 9:35 am
Ryan North did not sufficiently prepare me for the terrars involved in looking at that. I feel as if I’ve gazed upon some sort of blinking Cthulhu.
By JeremyP on 08.03.06 10:02 am
Oh, please.
Think back to the first time you lot ever started messing around with “web stuff” — I don’t mean the first time someone ever set up a cool feature for you, but the first time *you* ever tried to do something web-specific on your own. I’ll imagine, by and large, it was equally minor and probably annoying to at least two or three people. The only difference was that I imagine none of you were actually making money off it at the time.
I suppose we’ve all become too sophisticated to appreciate this for what it is — someone taking her first steps in a different medium — but even so, this reaction seems over the top.
By Christopher B. Wright on 08.03.06 11:47 am
Well, it’s hardly Lynn’s “first steps in a different medium” – FBoFW has been online for years, and their website is really complete. If you look on the site, she’s got a whole team working on the strip, including one person just in charge of the website.
Anyway! I’m not making fun of FBoFW (it’s a comic I respect), but we are having fun with the jarringly bad animation.
By Ryan on 08.03.06 4:13 pm
What I want to know is, did they introduce this before or after Alfred of Goats started flickering?
By Andrew Nagy on 08.04.06 10:06 am
Sure, Christopher… we can all think back to when we first started messing with Web Stuff. But Lynn has professionals in multiple fields at her disposal — including some great web-designers, as the slick layout of her site shows. Certainly SOMEBODY could have pointed out how silly and/or ugly the blinking eyes were.
Sadly, there is a poll up, and people who like the animations outnumber people who don’t by more than 2:1. It’s possible the only people who hate this are artists…
By Howard Tayler on 08.05.06 10:14 am
The above comments are owned by whoever posted them. The staff of Fleen are not responsible for them in any way.